I still find the use of āAIā somewhat misleading. AI generally implies a broader capability, while a chatbot often lacks the flexibility to handle diverse topics. Users shouldnāt have to explain their interests to the system for effective personalization. Many e-commerce platforms use technologies like Algolia, which involve AI techniques, but they donāt need to explicitly label themselves as āAI-poweredā or revolutionize system. If the personalization relies more on predefined algorithms or basic search capabilities, rather than advanced AI techniques, it might be better to avoid the term.
Unless you incorporate genuine AI capabilitiesālike machine learning for understanding user behavior or improving responses over timeāthen it could be appropriate to use āAI.ā AI personalization would automatically analyze user behavior without requiring direct interaction.
For example to truly revolutionize event ticketing with AI-powered, the system could leverage image recognition to identify tickets and events. Users could simply send an image of an event, and they would be redirected to the corresponding ticket store or if a user sends an image of a ticket, they would receive an explanation of the event.
or
By integrating with usersā social media, it can analyze their interests and predict potential ticket preferences based on their feeds.
or
The AI could draft personalized schedules for upcoming events within a budget, recommending options that align with user interests.
Effective personalization must differentiate between live and static events, which requires continuous re-training and low-latency inference to ensure recommendations remain relevant. This approach will demand significant resources and should align seamlessly with the overall business model but I see little evidence of a clear business model in the current concept.
I think the suitable title for your current idea project is āTokenized Ticketing with Chatbot,ā as it primarily focuses on tokenization via blockchain without the complexities of smart contracts for a marketplace yet. You can change and grow based on the progress later.
The idea that NFTs can prevent scammers is fundamentally flawed too. Scammers will always adapt, and introducing complexity through NFTs can make the system a more appealing target for them. Many users simply want a straightforward purchasing experience, but requiring them to navigate cryptocurrency transactions, determine which crypto to use, and validate the right NFT contract ticket, validate smart contract addresses adds unnecessary hurdles.
These complexities can lead to a poor user experience, creating more opportunities for scammers to exploit INEXPERIENCED users. Scammer donāt target expert, they target the beginner with lack of knowledge about the system.Simplifying the purchasing process would be a more effective approach to protecting users, or providing B2B solutions can help with Web3 adoption. In the end, you still need to secure partnerships with early providers for the ticketing system to gain traction, and that strategy doesnāt seem to be in your current progress