Your peer-to-peer (P2P) model does indeed address several key concerns, particularly around reducing the need for intermediaries and enhancing transparency through smart contracts. However, while it may minimize some traditional risks and regulatory challenges, the DeFi space is still subject to evolving regulatory frameworks, even in P2P transactions.
Are you exploring options for an insurance pool or some form of guarantee for lenders in the event of borrower default?
2 Likes
Thank you for pointing that out! We are indeed aware of the evolving regulatory landscape, and while our peer-to-peer (P2P) model minimizes many traditional risks, weâre also considering options for additional security. Introducing an insurance pool or guarantee mechanism is something weâre exploring as a way to protect lenders against borrower defaults. While itâs not part of the MVP, itâs definitely on our roadmap for future iterations to enhance trust and security within the platform.
What are your thoughts on community-based insurance pools in decentralized systems?
2 Likes
Community-based insurance pools can be a promising solution in decentralized systems, offering a way to manage risk collectively while also fostering a sense of community among users. Also, it allow users to collectively share risks, which can lead to more affordable coverage options.
2 Likes
How do you envision structuring the insurance pool? Will it operate on a mutual basis where all participants contribute to the fund?
2 Likes
Youâre absolutely right! Community-based insurance pools do offer a great way to manage risk collectively, and they align well with the decentralized ethos of platforms like ours. By distributing risk across a larger group, it makes coverage more affordable and accessible. Plus, it encourages trust and collaboration within the community, which is essential for building a sustainable ecosystem. Have you seen any successful implementations of this model in other DeFi projects?
2 Likes
Great question! The insurance pool would indeed operate on a mutual basis, where all participants contribute to the fund. The idea is that lenders and even borrowers could contribute a small percentage of their transactions to the pool. In the event of a borrower default, the pool would cover the lenderâs loss, up to a certain limit. This collective approach helps spread the risk and creates a safety net for everyone involved.
2 Likes
If this is the case then i think it would favor the community to also deduct reasonable charges from gains as well.
1 Like
If there is a loss based on volatile markets and there is a level of compensation for that, i think it would be cool to also gain something reasonable from the profits
2 Likes
A mutual insurance pool where both lenders and borrowers contribute is a promising approach for fostering a sustainable and equitable risk-sharing model. How will you determine the appropriate percentage of each transaction to be contributed to the insurance pool?
1 Like
Personally, I think itâs over my head, and I wouldnât want to reinvent the wheel- especially as it isnât the main focus of the platform.
Perhaps integrating with an established carbon credit-focused platform would be the way to go for this.
For example, for an app our team is building on Stellar, where users can retire carbon credits with donations, we partnered with StellarCarbon- a project which is entirely focused on carbon credits.
This could look something like: you provide the crowdfunding infrastructure, and the other eco-project handles the distribution of carbon credits. Something like that. I donât know to be honest!
Itâs a very interesting topic and Iâd be happy to discuss it further after the hackathon maybe. Does Tron Foundation have an ecological/climate-focused track for grants?
2 Likes
Ok, thanks for this clarity. This leave me with this question;
- How can the loan be secured?
- What happen if the fundraiser fail to repay the loan they borrowed to fund the project?
- Are there insurance measures to protect lenders in situations when fundraisers fail to repay their loans?
3 Likes
- Loans on Glintfund are secured through smart contracts, which enforce repayment terms. If the borrower fails to repay, the collateral posted or agreed penalty terms come into effect, protecting the lender. Would adding a decentralized insurance mechanism for lenders, like a pooled insurance fund, make you more comfortable lending on Glintfund?
- If a fundraiser fails to repay the loan, Glintfundâs smart contract automatically triggers pre-agreed penalties, such as transferring collateral or applying fines to protect lenders from total loss.What types of penalties or collateral would you consider effective for minimizing risk in P2P lending platforms?
- Currently, thereâs no specific insurance, but incorporating a decentralized insurance pool where a small fee is contributed for coverage could help protect lenders against default risks.
Thanks for sharing your insights! I agree, reinventing the wheel can be unnecessary, and partnering with an established carbon credit platform could be a smart approach for Glintfund. Integrating a project like StellarCarbon or a similar platform focused on carbon credits for our eco-friendly campaigns sounds feasible. It could allow us to focus on crowdfunding while they handle the carbon credits.
We can definitely discuss further on this.
3 Likes
Thatâs actually a great point! Establishing a balanced contribution to the mutual insurance pool is crucial. We could base the percentage on factors like loan amount, risk level of the borrower, and duration of the loan. A dynamic rate might work, where high-risk or long-term loans contribute slightly more to cover potential defaults. What are your thoughts on a flexible vs. fixed contribution rate for sustainability in the long run?
2 Likes
Thatâs an interesting idea! Sharing profits as part of a compensation structure could incentivize both lenders and borrowers. A model where the insurance pool not only covers losses but also distributes a portion of any excess profits could be a win-win. How would you propose structuring the profit-sharing to ensure fairness while maintaining the fundâs stability?
2 Likes
The app is live and will be dropping the link, looking forward to yâall contributions and comments
2 Likes
I would recommend looking into KlimaDAO!
They are hosting a workshop on tokenized carbon credits this Friday as part of the Funding the Commons hackathon. You can find a link through these pages:
3 Likes
This absolutely creates a more tailored risk management system.
In my opinion, I think a flexible contribution rate can provide much-needed nuance to risk management but however, it introduces complexity that must be carefully managed to prevent alienating users. Striking the right balance between protecting the insurance pool and keeping rates reasonable is key to long-term sustainability.
4 Likes
Hi mr @papaofei âŠ
Thanks for replly my quistion
4 Likes
Youâre actually rightâflexible rates help manage risks but add complexity. To maintain balance, we could cap rates, offer clear insights, and educate users on the benefits. How about adjusting rates based on market trends?
4 Likes