I truly appreciate your response, it’s quite short but as detailed as it can get.
Then again, I see your approach is based off of common concerns and strategic alignment and that quite makes a lot of sense. I’ve quite a few questions moving forward;
Given that polls can provide valuable insight, how will you encourage broad participation in them? Will you offer incentives for users to engage in the polling process, or do you plan to rely on organic participation?
Interesting suggestions within your questions…
While organic participation may yield the least quantitative results on this forum, the quality could be a bit more accurate. For instance, if we were to provide incentives to engage in polls, how would we be sure the chosen poll answers aren’t arbitrary where the focus was really just to gain the incentives? the results could be skewed. However, it could be a hybrid of the two, where some polls we could choose 1-2 respondents to reward for participation, after the fact but not specifically mentioned there will be such beforehand for every poll. Either way this kind of stuff will be taken into consideration. 
Thank you for your responding, I do not really know what ancillary systems is that you are talking about and I am not shamed to ask, is it crypto term, thank you
No worries. Its not a crypto term. Its another way of saying, (“support” or “additional” -systems for alerts etc…)
We are really learning everyday, thank you for making it clear for me
It’s great that you’re thinking through the balance between incentivizing participation and maintaining the integrity of the poll results. And also, incentives can be a powerful tool for engagement, but as you pointed out, they can sometimes lead to less thoughtful responses if users are primarily focused on rewards. I’ve a few questions moving forward;
How do you plan to assess whether the poll results are providing genuinely helpful insights? Would you look for patterns like consistency with previous feedback, or perhaps conduct follow-up polls to confirm certain conclusions?
@manfred_jr We can simply post polls occasionally and gauge feedback from there without overthinking it beforehand…
///
Based on the docs link above, MintDeals plans to have a set fee for the creation of clubs. Should we charge a fair fee (USDT/USDD) for club creation?
A portion of this fee is planned to be used to increase the Credit Facility’s borrowing capacity with the rest going towards ongoing platform growth and development. What would you suggest as a suitable split ratio:
Please let us know your thoughts and any suggestions you may have on this.
Thanks for the feedback and support! 