Hey, thanks for the feedback, let us get back to you about it.
Hello! Your team was disqualified due to:
Our extension can be downloaded from Github, added as an extension, and it works.
- team was extended, plus 2 new mentors joined us
- extension is in Github and works, ready to use
- token deployed, launched on JM
- yeah, the mobile app part is not ready, as it’s planned for 2023 Q2, which was written down in our roadmap & whitepaper even in S2.
Although we won’t argue and accept the fact, there’s just one thing we’d like to get clarified which might help others too.
In our S2 submission, we’ve written down the whole picture of an ecosystem we’re creating (“crypto cashback & reward platform”) with a detailed roadmap, that we’re nicely following.
But based on your feedback, everything we do in the next 2-3 years won’t be considered until we fullfill everything that was mentioned in S2 as a future plan?
While some are breaking apart their projects and launching always “new” ones, we (and other projects too) are doing the opposite. We’re doing the whole thing under one ecosystem, will follow the same roadmap for years while we expand & improve and add new features to our project under the same name, ThanX.
All in all, there are a lot of participants that are being punished for “only” improving their current projects and not “selling” it as a new one.
So I think this should be considered in future Hackathons.
Thank you for your time reading it.