The subscription model aka FlixPass has different tiers designed to cater to the diverse preferences of our users and creators.
Standard Tier: This level provides access to premium arts and videos, enhancing the viewer’s experience by offering exclusive content that isn’t available to non-subscribers.
Premium Tier: This offers an ad-free experience across all premium and free content, which is great for users who prefer uninterrupted access to digital art and entertainment.
Addon for Rental Access: Subscribers can opt for this addon to access all the rentable content for a period of time, expanding the range of artworks available to them.
These options are designed to enhance the value proposition by allowing users to customize their viewing experience according to their preferences, while also creating a stable revenue stream for creators.
Right now, I’ve settled on this pricing structure for the pass. Also, what you’re seeing isn’t final.
I’m playing with the idea of rolling out annual passes, too. Still scratching my head over what to charge for those.
Creating a PDF guide is indeed a great suggestion! I’m in the process of preparing a document with GitBook that outlines all the features and functionalities of Flixe. This guide will be accessible to all first-time users to assist them in effectively navigating the platform and making the most of their experience with Flixe. Will share that once it’s ready
Thank you for the encouragement Despite the challenges and not winning an award previously, our belief in Flixe’s potential is stronger than ever. We are dedicated to improving and adapting the platform to better meet the needs of our users and to make a significant impact in the digital art space.
Immersive Arts are designed to provide a more immersive experience that surrounds the user, enhancing their sensory engagement with the art. This covers the 360°, 180°, VR, AR, MR types of ARTs.
Imperio Dynamic ART on the other hand, offers much more than just the ability to embed names before making a purchase. It’s a variant of Dynamic Art, which is based on JavaScript. With Imperio, you have the control to modify the JavaScript variables that have been made accessible for customization by the artist. This allows you to interact with or personalize the artwork to an unprecedented degree.
In the example image above, you can see that it’s possible to customize the properties of the ART. There are limitless possibilities for this kind of customization, as we can provide users with any level of control, as determined by the artist, to greatly enhance user interaction and personalization of the art.
The idea and the code weren’t fully ready for the previous hackathon, and only now have I managed to finalize it. It took some time to figure out the larger picture and find where that idea fits best. Also, this concept has been significantly improved and enhanced for public use only recently.
This is gonna be the best project out there. This can help bring tons of new people to TRON blockchain. This is a very family friendly platform for everyone to use and looks like it will be super simple and easy. Seems great
Absolutely, the enthusiasm is contagious! We’re really excited about the project’s potential to attract new users to the TRON blockchain. We’ve designed it to be incredibly user-friendly so that anyone can dive in effortlessly. Thanks for your kind words
Detachments from work are necessary so a vacation from the matrix is most times therapeutic, but you took so long buddy, I damn near thought you abandoned your project mid questioning but that’s by the way.
Moving forward, it’s great to see how thoughtfully the FlixPass membership model is designed, with several tiers to accommodate to the diverse needs of users and artists.
How do you determine which content is limited to Standard tier subscribers? Are there any specific criteria or procedures in place for picking premium content, and how frequently is this content updated to keep users engaged?
I’m currently developing an integrated issue and a community feedback management system for Flixe. Until it’s up and running, the TRON forum is our primary means of communication with the community.
We’re also considering expanding our presence on social media also.
Regarding the FlixPass membership model, currently, we don’t have a standardized method to validate which content becomes premium. The creators on Flixe have complete control over deciding whether their content goes under the Standard or Premium tier.
As for future plans, we are considering the implementation of a vetting process, which would help standardize and quality-check content before it’s classified as Premium. This concept is still in the planning phase, and we’re exploring the best approaches to ensure it adds value both for our users and creators while maintaining the flexibility that our platform offers.
Good to see you are still improving and building,… but it’s so disheartening that most of good projects like yours will win and vanish but i hope you won’t be like most of them,… moreover I think this is the moment to expand and gradually build your socials like Twitter (X) and telegram,… how do you see it and what do you think about it
Thank you for providing insights into the existing approach to content classification inside the FlixPass membership model, as well as prospective intentions to introduce a vetting procedure. Reading your response makes me inquisitive;
How do you intend to strike a balance between producers’ autonomy in choosing the tier for their material and the necessity for uniform quality control measures? Is there any specific criteria or procedures that authors must follow when determining the tier for their content?
Thanks for the suggestion! I’m usually not that active on social media, but I’m planning to change that and get more involved soon. It’s important to keep everyone in the loop and grow our community on platforms like Twitter and Telegram as you have suggested.
Thanks for your interest in how we manage content tiers at Flixe. Currently, we haven’t set any restrictions on how creators choose the tier for their content. However, we are considering developing a system that offers guidelines aimed at ensuring quality while respecting the creators’ independence. This system would also include a pre-publication review process, allowing for quality checks and revisions before content goes live.
Thank you for your question! As of now, we haven’t finalized our approach to organizing the feedback collection process. We’re still exploring the best methods to ensure that we gather comprehensive and useful feedback effectively. If you have any suggestions or ideas on this, we’d love to hear them!
Despite the challenges and not winning an award previously, our belief in Flixe’s potential is stronger than ever. We are dedicated to improving and adapting the platform to better meet the needs of our users and to make a significant impact in the digital art space.
