Sun Banana a.k.a. $SUNANA

TBL
42

Hi Dendorion,

Nice to meet you. I’m happy to go over everything related to Justin Moon.
Looking at my spreadsheet, it seems you were among the early participants who secured over 1% of the supply—does that sound right?

I noticed your recent comments suggesting we rugged. That’s simply not accurate, and I believe you know that. Our bubble map clearly shows when we bought and sold. In fact, we exited at a 20% loss, not including development time or the cost of maintaining 24/7 livestreaming—something no other competitor was doing at the time, aside from limited 1-hour sessions due to high costs.

I’ll go ahead and address your other points:

We reached a $20M market cap, and aside from modest marketing expenses, we didn’t sell any tokens until the price dropped back down to around $1M. If that’s not a show of commitment, I’m not sure what is. We weren’t looking for a quick cash-out. If that had been the goal, we could’ve easily exited at the top and disappeared. But we’re a real business, with credible clients beyond the meme space. That’s why we approached Tron with a long-term vision.

In total, we deployed over 600K TRX into the project. We only withdrew (at a loss) after it became clear the promised support from Tron and Justin—conditional on reaching $10M market cap—wasn’t coming. Despite that, we still handed over Tron Eliza at no cost. So it’s hard to accept claims that we didn’t deliver.

We’re very open to building on Tron again. But serious commitment needs to go both ways. We’ve already submitted a proposal outlining what we can create.

Now let’s talk frankly: meme culture won’t grow organically on Tron anytime soon—not without serious capital and people who understand the space. None of the top $1B meme coins were fair launches, regardless of what they claim. They all manage supply closely. That’s just how the game works.

Regarding Moona—I’m not familiar with it. It looks like a copycat and based on Dextools, it peaked at $30K. That doesn’t even qualify as a proper launch.

Also, most serious meme teams launch 10–20 test versions to avoid sniper interference. As someone who snipes, I’m sure you understand this. One aggressive sniper can collapse a pool. If you’re holding 1–2% of a token in a 2–5% liquidity pool, that’s enough to wipe it out. If you genuinely want to see Tron succeed, it might be worth dialing back the greed and helping the ecosystem grow.

43

Thanks for clarifying. And thanks for your take on what is needed.

44

Correct i hold little over 1% of Moon and still do and no i did not snipe it, and correct i think you rugged or at least the private investor group you guys talked about did .

Moona is launched by the same who launched SUNANA , and quite some insider wallets for SUNANA link towards MOON making the circle complete . Further on that i had confirmation from a very credible source you guys are the same team confirming my findings .

Anyway i wish you guys luck and hope you can make the project succesfull .

1 Like
45

Appreciate your message and transparency — and I respect that you’re still holding Moon.

Regarding the “sniper” label, maybe that’s not the right word, and I’ll admit we’ve probably used it too broadly. Internally, we flag wallets that buy in before certain parameters are live as potentially harmful to the project and its goals. Calling them “thieves” might sound harsh, but it reflects how those early actions can destabilize a launch — as we’ve seen with most memes on Tron.

That said, I totally understand how trying to control supply — which we also did — can be seen as “exploitative” in its own way. But the intent matters. We weren’t trying to game the system or take advantage of the community. We were aiming to create a sustainable launch with long-term potential. And while some may disagree with our approach, labeling it a “rug” just isn’t accurate.

Our investors never had access to project funds — so there was no scenario in which they could rug. In fact, between dev costs, infrastructure, and time, we’re personally down around $50–60K on this launch. When the market cap dipped to about $1M, we did pull liquidity to prevent deeper losses — but not a single token was sold by us during the entire run-up to $20M. That’s all verifiable on-chain.

We were told support would come at $10M — it didn’t. We waited, kept building, and kept taking losses, hoping support would arrive. Unfortunately, it never did. Tron had a real opportunity to put AI on the map — but the momentum stalled, and the buzz faded. If this had been about profit, we would’ve walked away long ago. Our vision was to build something meaningful on Tron — a foundation for a long-term ecosystem.

And we’re still open to that — but only if there’s real commitment on both sides. Meme culture doesn’t build itself. It takes funding, coordination, and a community willing to go all-in. “Fair launch” alone isn’t a strategy — it’s just a starting point. Most top memes today still control a significant portion of their supply. That’s how this space works — and anyone deep in it knows that.

By the way, if Moona is tied to us, it was likely one of the 20 decoy tokens we launched. That’s standard practice in meme launches — you put out multiple versions, monitor sniper activity, and proceed with the one that shows the cleanest entry. That’s meme launch 101, especially when the name had already leaked and was clearly being targeted. It’s not deception — it’s protection.