You nailed it raw,…I observe somethings from some projects on Tron and Klever chain , they solely rely on the team or founder of the Blockchain they are under to do everything for them,… when you see most projects on Bsc how they market the hell with respective projects
We have to wake up and do things differently
3 Likes
Should I extend this to mean that recent high cost transaction on tron has been the reason some projects failed to succeed?
1 Like
another topic raised 
Please let me answer. “NO” because even eth people still build on it.
We don’t have many active users. Tron is even better than bttc in terms of users
1 Like
It doesn’t make sense to apply gameFi to TRON unless its only for settlements like connecting TRON to pay for in-game GEMS or something.
If your game has thousands of transactions it needs to do on the blockchain and is 100% connected to the blockchain where every action in itself is a transaction then it would be far better suited for BTTC or even its own personal chain.
Regardless I don’t think anyone has mastered the GameFi model itself. Gaming and Finance don’t seem to mix and I’d rather developers focus on making a really good “Game” then on “monetization” practices and incorporating play-to-earn mechanics that somehow just seem to end up in massive inflation or death of the game.
It also gives you the wrong target audience. As a game studio you want passionate story-telling and an audience that plays games. You don’t want to target people who just play the game to max out earning potential.
These are just my thoughts though and not really on - topic. 
1 Like
Do you have examples of such games?
Most games I know, in game purchases are done offchain. And even when you are withdrawing nfts or tokens, the charge in their native tokens.
One example is Devikins and they still support tron
1 Like
agreed
The gaming industry was already hot without play to earn. We use to pay to play and enjoy a lot lol.
Most gamefi projects are not even giving us the best games. They create anything and advertise with play to earn.
2 Likes
I agree with you.
One of the biggest challenges is that gaming and finance are two very different thing.
Gamers want to have fun and be entertained, while investors want to make money. It can be difficult to balance these two goals, and some GameFi projects have struggled to do so.
Another challenge is that the play-to-earn model can lead to inflation. When players can earn money by playing a game, it can drive up the demand for in-game items, which can lead to prices skyrocketing. This can make it difficult for new players to enter the game, and it can also make it difficult for the game to sustain itself in the long term.
For best GameFi projects will be those that focus on making a great game first, If the game is fun and engaging, players will be more likely to stick around, even if the play-to-earn mechanics aren’t perfect.
The basic most important thing for GameFi projects is to focus on making a great game. If they can do that, they will be more likely to succeed in the long term.
Just my opinion
2 Likes
In a game where everything is an NFT maybe? Not sure.
Ok in devikins, the only nft you can send on chain is the game characters. Weapons are nft but I don’t think it is onchain. You can send them to their players in game and also send the characters in game and the fee will be charged in the native token
1 Like
Hahahahahahaha!
Shared in the same line of thought. Most of the failed projects happened because of lack of clear development plans by the devs. They only think that once they launch their projects on tron, they will succeed because of large community base of the network. Most of them lack the ability to push their projects to success and that is why, when they thought that their expectations are not met, they rush to other chain and still fail again
3 Likes
While I understand your concerns, I believe integrating TRON with GameFi can offer more than just settlements. It can provide a secure and transparent platform for various in-game transactions, like trading virtual assets.
While games with thousands of transactions may benefit from other blockchains like BTTC, TRON’s scalability make it a feasible option for many game developers. It also offers a user-friendly environment and has an established user base, which provides a ready market for game developers to tap into which I believe, makes it ideal over other chains.
Regarding your concerns about the GameFi model itself, it’s true that it is still evolving, and there are challenges to be addressed. However, the potential for players to earn real-world value and the integration of financial mechanisms can enhance the gaming experience and incentivize player engagement.
Just as it’s important to focus on creating compelling game experiences, incorporating GameFi elements, imho, can still attract a broader audience and this can result in a more engaged player base, increasing the game’s longevity and success.
2 Likes
That’s a good idea
I hope the team behind forum will
Consider your suggestions. I think
it will be a great way to show their
appreciation for the contributors who
make forum such a great resource.
Thanks for bringing it up bro.
2 Likes
Thank you brother. 