so much big big comments lol 
In as much as we would love people summit project on time. It might be very impossible to expect them to build everything before sending it to the community to go through.
nothing is easy in this life we are all struggling in one to another way
The more confuse you
are the more depressed you are in
-
If the purpose of this hackathon is to develop the Tron blockchain and have valuable projects in the ecosystem, non-participatory accounts should not be allow to participate in voting. Only those that engage with developers during hackathon and project development should be qualify to vote.
-
This is a serious issue that solving is nearly impossible because you cannot disqualify a project that register for the hackathon some minutes before the end of hackathon registration with the reason that the community were not able to take a review of their project submission. To help in this issue, I suggest that the team should give a period of one month after the end of submission so that the community can read all project submissions and engage with the devs.
-
It will be nice to engage with hackathon winners in a Twitter space and I will join the space anytime it is fix. I recommend for a telegram video chat to also be added to it so that we can get to know who these developers are.
-
There should be a Twitter space regularly to educate and serve as a strategy of onboarding new users to the Tron community. The Twitter space will solely be for the discussion of Tron resources eg the energy and bandwidth. The speakers in this space will educate the community especially new users how the network works and what this energy is and why it is needed in carrying out transactions in the network.
6 Likes
I am only just wondering because I am new to the forum things, I say if you are the admin how come that you do not have control over the fake votes people like that should be stopped
I agree with you. Most of them will evaluate what they will likely gain in financial terms for staying active on the forum and will choose to just develop a soon to be ‘dormant’ project to go for the big bag. We need everyone to be active here. If they can’t be active to check submissions, they should equally not be active to vote 
2 Likes
I’m sorry to question your jurisdiction in the handling of governance affairs in the forum but by every sense of the word, this statement is morally wrong.
As admin or rather mouthpiece of admins, we the forum members deserve a walk-through of how the purgatory would be done to sanitize the botted votes, case in quote is the Builder Track, that close margin between Bond and JM almost look flawed to me and all we request for is accountability, thank you.
1 Like
sounds funny right. We need to solve it once and for all. I am happy how it is going now. let’s see how it goes.
1 Like
My boss what did you see, last days they say is always dangerous so maybe bond utilized that and passed JM. Still not final results. I have noticed something and I like how this year’s voting is going. Builders track is on fire. We used to say bot voting whenever new projects overtake OG projects, now it’s between OGs. Let’s see the final results.
2 Likes
This thing is becoming quite annoying. Would you be asking for the same commitment to vote cleanup if JM was ahead of Bond by 1 vote?
1 Like
One more thing regarding Bond votes: on S6 we got 170, while in S5 we got 218. We received significantly less votes, yet many users find our votes suspicious. I don’t get it.
1 Like
Tempers are already flaring bro, opinions would really add salt to open injury right now lol.
Hey buddy! no one’s outright accusing your votes of being suspicious but there’s definitely some talk about it. Remember when I mentioned earlier how huge it is that you surpassed JM ? They’ve got quite the following on Tron. Plus the ustx team is also hugely popular within the Tron community so, this win is a massive accomplishment for you guys
It’s getting real heated over here and I think the admin should address this issues once and for all.
1 Like
Just giving an example of 1000 trx it could be lower. If someone unstake during vote time they will not be eligible to vote but they can unstake after voting. Just brainstorming some ideas.
1 Like
I am surprise too 
May be the goal of hosting this hackathons is not to build a strong ecosystem but to let community vote on projects they want in the Tron blockchain 
Seems you didn’t understand my point. Let me try to be more clear here.
Assuming you want to build a car, I believe before you start taking the step or entering any empowerment event or competition, you should already know why you want to build the car (purpose), what you or your potential users need the car for (value), what you expect the car to do for the users or what the user will achieve with the car (goal), and how you are going to start building the car (detail).
Coming to hackathon and post submissions, these are the information needed to make a complete post submission and before a developer start developing any project, it’s expected that the developer should know how the project they are building should answer these questions. Why then can’t they provide these answers on one post submission. Why should it take up to 5 occasions for them to provide answers to these questions? To me it doesn’t make any sense. They can provide these information about their project and move on to developing their project while community members study what they are building and engage with them.
I hope this provide a clear understanding to what I said in my earlier comment.
1 Like
Oh I understand you better now. So basically you need the team to put out their project description, value and goals and maybe a little of what the have worked on during their first submission.
Good to have this round of questions .
-
You can not expect users to be active here when there is nothing going on . Personally only rarely check this forum . If the voters are real they are real and votes should be counted .
-
Create a deadline 2 weeks before the voting starts that all projects must have submitted their project . Then from those 2 weeks have a community question session . This way projects know questions regarding their projects can come and they should respond . Failing to engage with the community in my opinion shows there is no serious intend in releasing a product .
-
I like the demo week addition . Would certainly attend such twitter spaces . I think overall there should be more twitter spaces again . Dao went a bit silent on that part .
-
As a long term tron user and also as owner of a energy rental platform i believe the current energy situation is a unique factor. By renting energy users can cut 80% of the transaction costs . And energy suppliers can earn a steady income which most importantly is SAFE . Something you find not on any of the other blockchains . Speaking from experience this system is also what is recently attracting new users into the Tron ecosystem. Most of the remaining Tron community is active in the energy rental sector . This does not prevent me from interacting with other DAPPS , there just are not many DAPPS on tron .
However recently big entities like Binance , Trondao , Justin . Have been freezing large amounts of TRX for energy reducing everyone their total energy . If this would be used it would not be a problem but these entities have a large portion of their energy unused . Ideal solution would be for them to unfreeze their unused energy and freeze them as bandwidth . This way less TRX is needed to be staked by people to get free transactions .
5 Likes